From the Introduction in the Robert Fagles version:
"It is just as sentimental to pretend that war does not have its monstrous ugliness as it is to deny that it has its own strange and fatal beauty, a power, which can call out in men resources of endurance, courage and self-sacrifice that peacetime, to our sorrow and loss, can rarely command."
This from the translator of the three-thousand-year-old story. I don't know if Fagles was a soldier, or if he'd feel this way had he seen war in person rather than on the page. Dulce et decorum est....
At the same time, I wonder: is he right? Is there a rare and sharp magic to the terrible circumstance of war? Or is that little more than a tweedy post-facto justification?
Never having seen war myself, I can't answer, I can only ask. And maybe that's what good writing, good stories, should do: not answer but ask the question in the first place.
In which case: well done, Homer!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Perhaps that is why an author like Homer has been remembered in literature for so very long compared to say...Danielle Steele?
Ha ha, could be! Not that there's anything wrong with Danielle Steele, but let's face it: she's not Homer.
Post a Comment